New Jersey Online Gambling Revenue Drops for First Time

New Jersey Online Gambling Revenue Drops for First Time

New Jersey’s Atlantic City casinos saw online gambling profits fall for the time that is first April. (Image:

While royal casino las vegas the revenues from New Jersey’s emerging online gambling market were tiny, most observers have actually remained upbeat about the long-term prospects for Internet gambling in their state. After all, since the launch associated with websites in November of last year, online casino and poker games have actually brought in more and more cash each thirty days, suggesting that steady growth could possibly be expected for some time.

But that streak is now at a conclusion. Online gambling revenues were down somewhat for nj-new jersey in April, dropping to a total of $11.4 million for the month. That’s about a half-million less than in March, whenever sites earned $11.9 million.

The main reason for this is that April had one less day than March. But that doesn’t tell the whole tale: the average take daily was additionally down very slightly, dropping from $383,173 in March to $380,958 in April.

This comes after strong gains in recent months. Both January and March saw double-digit monthly gains over previous months, while even February the quickest month of the season saw a nine percent enhance over January.

Good Weather, Payment Issues Cited

Officials cited reasons that are possible the decrease, while remaining upbeat about the long run of online gambling in the state.

‘Maybe when the climate was good, the laptops got closed and folks decided to come down to Atlantic City,’ said Matt Levinson, chairman for the New Jersey Casino Control Commission. Levinson also cited the continued issues with bank card deposits as being a factor that is major.

‘It merely takes time when launching a business that is new’ stated Joe Lupo, senior vice president of the Borgata casino. Lupo also cited the payment processing dilemmas as a problem, whilst also noting that increased options that are mobile phones and tablets will ultimately assist enhance revenues going forward.

Even as we’ve recently reported, as much as half or more of all credit and debit card transactions to New Jersey online casinos were rejected by the banks issuing those cards. The problem was more prevalent with Visa cards than MasterCard products, while American Express and Discover do not accept any online gambling deals.

Overall, the Borgata has still been the greatest on the web gambling winner in 2014, consuming $16.4 million this year. Caesars Interactive has made $13.1 million up to now, while the Tropicana has received revenues of $6.2 million. Other web sites have made under $3 million since January.

Overall Profits for Casinos Up

While online casino winnings may have stalled for the month, they nevertheless helped increase overall profits for Atlantic City casinos. The sum total take combining live and winnings that are online up 3.2 percent to $235.9 million. That’s regardless of the reality that revenues from brick-and-mortar casinos were down 1.8 percent year-over-year, though that number changes to a 3.3 percent increase if you discount final year’s revenues from the Atlantic Club, that will be not in operation.

The biggest increase originated from the struggling Revel Casino Hotel, which saw revenues jump 55 percent from last year. Other winners were the Golden Nugget, Caesars, and Borgata. Meanwhile, Trump Plaza saw a decline of 26 percent, the worst of any casino in the city.

New York Casinos Set $350 Million Minimum for Prized Areas

Scenic Orange County in New York State is becoming a hotly contested location for casino designers. (Image: Catholic Charities Orange County)

We’re still at the least a few years away from a casino that is real proposed in nyc City, also it’s hard to imagine just how competitive and expensive the battle for that license will be. Until that time, the most desirable locations in New York State are those closest towards the city, and developers likely to have to get considerably to earn the rights to build there. But the state has released their figures that are minimum and they are lower than most anticipated far too low, based on some.

New York gambling regulators have announced that anybody attempting to develop a casino in Orange or Dutchess County both locations that might be approximately hour north of NYC will need to agree to investing at least $350 million in the project. That doesn’t include other fees for buying land or financing the project, making the real minimum close to $500 million, according to quotes by the Gambling Facility venue Board.

Figure Lower Than Expected

That’s not exactly a drop in the bucket, also it’s enough to make sure that only serious designers will bother staying within the bidding procedure. But in a day and age whenever casino resort tasks are often multibillion buck investments, the amount for the most useful location in upstate New York strikes some as rather low.

‘I think it shows that they are rushing through this and that this has clearly perhaps not been thought out,’ stated Mitchell Grossinger Etess of the Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority, which really wants to build a casino near Monticello. ‘The premium spot, as well as are only asking $350 million? It willn’t speak to creating economic development.’

The disappointment in the figure ended up being strongest among lawmakers in Sullivan and Ulster Counties. Those locations edge Orange and Dutchess Counties, but are farther away from ny City. Officials there had hoped that the state would put a really cost that is high building in many desirable locations, which in turn might convince some developers to find a cheaper choice in their counties.

Lower Minimums in Other Places

A license in the rest of ‘Region 1’ which includes Sullivan, Ulster, Columbia, Delaware and Greene Counties would need a minimum investment of just $130 million. That number would drop further to $100 million if another license had been given to build in Dutchess County or Orange County. Other places across the state had minimums set between $70 million and $135 million.

But despite having those relatively low figures, many fear that if a casino were integrated Dutchess or Orange, it would be quite difficult to find a firm willing to compete keenly against them in the Catskills.

Certainly, the $350 million cost isn’t scaring anybody away. Major organizations such as Genting and Caesars Entertainment have stated that a $350 million investment in an Orange County casino doesn’t trouble them at all. Even a player that is minor Greenetrack has proposed creating a $500 million casino in the region, well above the necessary minimum.

A complete of 22 groups presented $1 million application costs to be considered for casino licenses in one of several regions of upstate New York. After hearing the minimal investment thresholds, the operators were given five business days to back down and receive a full refund should they wanted to do therefore.

Gambling State Legislators Release iGaming Policy Framework

James Waldman and other US lawmakers want states to regulate online gambling on their very own. (Image:

If you’ve been following our protection of online gaming lately, you understand that there is a battle that is fierce at least behind the scenes over the long term of Internet gambling in the us. Groups such as Sheldon Adelson’s Coalition to get rid of Internet Gambling (C2SIG) are seeking a federal ban of online casinos, while others are looking for regulation that will create a federal network for online poker or other games.

But those aren’t the only options on the table, plus some legislators want to press forward with other solutions that are potential. One such plan ended up being just released by the nationwide Council of Legislators from Gaming States (NCLGS), a group of lawmakers from states that have a large stake in the gambling industry.

The policy framework, which happens to be in a draft form, had been only released after talking with number of different groups and stakeholders in the gaming industry. That included the nationwide Indian Gaming Association, the American Gaming Association, and the National Council on Problem Gambling. The insurance policy statement known as Policy Framework for the Regulation of Internet Gaming comes in reaction to a consultation that is public the NCLGS launched last December.

A Model for States to Think About

The idea is for the policy framework to be utilized as a model of states considering adding online gambling to their gaming choices. It covers a true amount of policy conditions that tend to be difficult for states to contend with, such as for instance player protection, geolocation and individual verification, and agreements between various jurisdictions, such as for example player-sharing compacts.

‘As a group of legislators responsible for sound gaming policy that is public our respective states, NCLGS acknowledges the threats, along with the opportunities, involved with new technology and Internet video gaming,’ said James Waldman, president associated with NCLGS. ‘NCLGS wants to guarantee that the effective system is in position for people who do allow intrastate Internet gaming and that policy criteria have been in destination to promote security and uniformity in states that could wish to form interstate Internet compacts.’

Legislators Oppose Federal Ban

While the nature of the policy draft implies, the NCLGS has arrived out against any ban that is federal online gambling. However, the group has also made it known that they’re not looking for federal legislation, either. Instead, they say that allowing states to control online gambling as they have traditionally finished with other kinds of video gaming such as horse racing, gambling enterprises and lotteries is considered the most effective means to carry out the industry.

‘States have actually the expertise, developed over many many years of experience, to oversee gaming for the best outcomes to the states and their customers,’ Waldman wrote final month in a letter to Congressional leaders. ‘It is our strong conviction, as legislators who chair and are members associated with legislative committees that work diligently to develop sound public video gaming policy, that states are the most appropriate entity to choose, and oversee, what sort of gaming should occur and what should not within their borders.’

The insurance policy framework isn’t yet in its last form, and is currently open to comment. It’ll be reviewed at the NCLGS summertime Meeting, that will be held in San Diego from June 5 to 9.